Comments on: Chrome extensions injecting adware into web pages visited, removed by Google https://news.thewindowsclub.com/chrome-extension-injecting-adware-web-pages-visited-removed-google-67277/ TheWindowsClub Tech News covers the latest Microsoft Windows 10 news, along with other products & services like Office, etc. Mon, 30 Mar 2015 12:41:17 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0 By: Gregg L. DesElms https://news.thewindowsclub.com/chrome-extension-injecting-adware-web-pages-visited-removed-google-67277/#comment-2212 Tue, 21 Jan 2014 16:58:00 +0000 http://news.thewindowsclub.com/?p=67277#comment-2212 And THAT, ladies and gentlemen, is what a man who’s off his meds looks like. Yikes.

__________________________________
Gregg L. DesElms
Napa, California USA
gregg at greggdeselms dot com

Veritas nihil veretur nisi abscondi.
Veritas nimium altercando amittitur.

]]> By: Gregg L. DesElms https://news.thewindowsclub.com/chrome-extension-injecting-adware-web-pages-visited-removed-google-67277/#comment-2208 Tue, 21 Jan 2014 04:54:00 +0000 http://news.thewindowsclub.com/?p=67277#comment-2208 This is a bigger problem than merely flagging extensions that do what these extensions did. The far larger problem, here, is developers SELLING their apps, and not putting into the contracts of sale that the new owners cannot do certain things with said sold apps. Such language is easy to draft, and while it is forgivable and an individual like “Add to Feedly’s” developer might not think to do that, it us outrageous that a big operation like Ars Technica, which has lawyers, would not do that.

Shame on at least Ars Technica!

__________________________________
Gregg L. DesElms
Napa, California USA
gregg at greggdeselms dot com

Veritas nihil veretur nisi abscondi.
Veritas nimium altercando amittitur.

]]>