<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Chrome 42 released with Push Notifications; Will block Java, Silverlight	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://news.thewindowsclub.com/google-launches-chrome-42-npapi-push-notifications-76969/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://news.thewindowsclub.com/google-launches-chrome-42-npapi-push-notifications-76969/</link>
	<description>TheWindowsClub Tech News covers the latest Microsoft Windows 10 news, along with other products &#38; services like Office, etc.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2015 19:35:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: hg007		</title>
		<link>https://news.thewindowsclub.com/google-launches-chrome-42-npapi-push-notifications-76969/#comment-5032</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hg007]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2015 00:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.thewindowsclub.com/?p=76969#comment-5032</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[wow.  You know, I resisted switching over to Chrome (from Firefox...I was a diehard until it started getting wonky on me about a year ago) for longer than many. But we use Google Drive for SO much at work (I&#039;m a teacher), so I finally took the plunge.  And now this.  Now what? Back to Firefox? Ugh.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow.  You know, I resisted switching over to Chrome (from Firefox&#8230;I was a diehard until it started getting wonky on me about a year ago) for longer than many. But we use Google Drive for SO much at work (I&#8217;m a teacher), so I finally took the plunge.  And now this.  Now what? Back to Firefox? Ugh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Nadezhda Simova		</title>
		<link>https://news.thewindowsclub.com/google-launches-chrome-42-npapi-push-notifications-76969/#comment-4980</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nadezhda Simova]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2015 11:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.thewindowsclub.com/?p=76969#comment-4980</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Nonsense!!! Blocking Silverlight?! REALLY???????? I&#039;m beyond annoyed...I&#039;ve used Chrome for quite some time now and have all my bookmarks and passwords saved, organised and all in one (which increased my productivity)...and now will have to switch it all to Firefox...all Chrome did for me is now pretty much ruined...RIDICULOUS!!!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nonsense!!! Blocking Silverlight?! REALLY???????? I&#8217;m beyond annoyed&#8230;I&#8217;ve used Chrome for quite some time now and have all my bookmarks and passwords saved, organised and all in one (which increased my productivity)&#8230;and now will have to switch it all to Firefox&#8230;all Chrome did for me is now pretty much ruined&#8230;RIDICULOUS!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mary		</title>
		<link>https://news.thewindowsclub.com/google-launches-chrome-42-npapi-push-notifications-76969/#comment-4954</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mary]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2015 03:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.thewindowsclub.com/?p=76969#comment-4954</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[How can such a radical change occur without prior notification.  There is obviously no customer care or consideration.  We use Silverlight for our UI and promoted the use of Chrome.  We will now be recommended IE, Firefox or any other browser.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can such a radical change occur without prior notification.  There is obviously no customer care or consideration.  We use Silverlight for our UI and promoted the use of Chrome.  We will now be recommended IE, Firefox or any other browser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Michael		</title>
		<link>https://news.thewindowsclub.com/google-launches-chrome-42-npapi-push-notifications-76969/#comment-4945</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2015 19:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.thewindowsclub.com/?p=76969#comment-4945</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Well there goes our support of chrome.  One of our main products uses Silverlight.  I&#039;ve always recommended Chrome to our customers. Looks like now we are going to have to recommend IE or Firefox since there is no way we can rewrite this software.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well there goes our support of chrome.  One of our main products uses Silverlight.  I&#8217;ve always recommended Chrome to our customers. Looks like now we are going to have to recommend IE or Firefox since there is no way we can rewrite this software.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mark P		</title>
		<link>https://news.thewindowsclub.com/google-launches-chrome-42-npapi-push-notifications-76969/#comment-4944</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark P]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2015 19:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.thewindowsclub.com/?p=76969#comment-4944</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Here&#039;s to Chrome dying a slow miserable death and Google with it.  I don&#039;t think they&#039;ll win this battle unfornately.  Too many enterprises depend on Java.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s to Chrome dying a slow miserable death and Google with it.  I don&#8217;t think they&#8217;ll win this battle unfornately.  Too many enterprises depend on Java.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Juan Figueroa		</title>
		<link>https://news.thewindowsclub.com/google-launches-chrome-42-npapi-push-notifications-76969/#comment-4941</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Juan Figueroa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2015 16:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.thewindowsclub.com/?p=76969#comment-4941</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Switch to Palemoon, is like Firefox or Chrome, less the lame radical changes like these one listed here.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Switch to Palemoon, is like Firefox or Chrome, less the lame radical changes like these one listed here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: মুহাম্মদ আরিফ &#124; Mohammad Arif		</title>
		<link>https://news.thewindowsclub.com/google-launches-chrome-42-npapi-push-notifications-76969/#comment-4940</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[মুহাম্মদ আরিফ &#124; Mohammad Arif]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2015 11:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.thewindowsclub.com/?p=76969#comment-4940</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I really hate such radical changes. Forced UI changes and stuffs like that really bother me.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really hate such radical changes. Forced UI changes and stuffs like that really bother me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dan		</title>
		<link>https://news.thewindowsclub.com/google-launches-chrome-42-npapi-push-notifications-76969/#comment-4938</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2015 22:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.thewindowsclub.com/?p=76969#comment-4938</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m using that version of Chrome at the moment. I just went to &quot;Browserscope&quot; and found, with Chrome being &quot;vanilla&quot; insofar as &quot;ScriptDefender&quot; and other xxs-type extensions, that it scored 16/17 re security; as usual, it failed the &quot;toStatic HTML API&quot; test, which (in absence of any known way to alter Chrome&#039;s settings or of any protective extension) pretty much means that a user is still susceptible to having a homepage or search engine hijacked by a malicious site or link, 


In addition to the usual ability to &quot;reset to default&quot; should a hijack occur, I believe in this version of Chrome a small window opens at time browser changes, allowing you to both know it happened and immediately reset. For now, it&#039;s become a replacement to me for Firefox, which even &quot;vanilla&quot; has been having problems with many sites...mainstream sites; also, it was crashing instead of closing, or often running in background despite closing.


My only concern is for eventually making it impossible to allow even one instance of Java, Silverlight, et al; I just tried &quot;vanilla&quot; Chrome at some corporate and government sites I know use Silverlight for public info web apps; at some Chrome gave me a constant &quot;wait&quot; wheel in tab bar, but pages functioned normally; I tried with up-to-date IE11, and got the same results minus wait wheel. Should any browser however come to treat all &quot;lazy coding&quot; or Java/Silverlight as if it were de facto malicious, ala Firefox functionality could be lost at some common sites...an impetus for webmasters to do better, perhaps, in a time 74% of sites affected by Heartbleed last year still have the vulnerability, e.g..


Thanks for a great article, hope I said something that matters, cheers to all!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m using that version of Chrome at the moment. I just went to &#8220;Browserscope&#8221; and found, with Chrome being &#8220;vanilla&#8221; insofar as &#8220;ScriptDefender&#8221; and other xxs-type extensions, that it scored 16/17 re security; as usual, it failed the &#8220;toStatic HTML API&#8221; test, which (in absence of any known way to alter Chrome&#8217;s settings or of any protective extension) pretty much means that a user is still susceptible to having a homepage or search engine hijacked by a malicious site or link, </p>
<p>In addition to the usual ability to &#8220;reset to default&#8221; should a hijack occur, I believe in this version of Chrome a small window opens at time browser changes, allowing you to both know it happened and immediately reset. For now, it&#8217;s become a replacement to me for Firefox, which even &#8220;vanilla&#8221; has been having problems with many sites&#8230;mainstream sites; also, it was crashing instead of closing, or often running in background despite closing.</p>
<p>My only concern is for eventually making it impossible to allow even one instance of Java, Silverlight, et al; I just tried &#8220;vanilla&#8221; Chrome at some corporate and government sites I know use Silverlight for public info web apps; at some Chrome gave me a constant &#8220;wait&#8221; wheel in tab bar, but pages functioned normally; I tried with up-to-date IE11, and got the same results minus wait wheel. Should any browser however come to treat all &#8220;lazy coding&#8221; or Java/Silverlight as if it were de facto malicious, ala Firefox functionality could be lost at some common sites&#8230;an impetus for webmasters to do better, perhaps, in a time 74% of sites affected by Heartbleed last year still have the vulnerability, e.g..</p>
<p>Thanks for a great article, hope I said something that matters, cheers to all!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
