<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Internet Explorer is the best at blocking malware, reports yet another study	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://news.thewindowsclub.com/internet-explorer-blocking-malware-reports-study-55178/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://news.thewindowsclub.com/internet-explorer-blocking-malware-reports-study-55178/</link>
	<description>TheWindowsClub Tech News covers the latest Microsoft Windows 10 news, along with other products &#38; services like Office, etc.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2016 03:50:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Jim Boyd		</title>
		<link>https://news.thewindowsclub.com/internet-explorer-blocking-malware-reports-study-55178/#comment-1156</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Boyd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2012 04:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewindowsclub.com/?p=55178#comment-1156</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[very time MS comes out with anew version of IE, NSS labs publishes results saying IE is best for blocking malware. Unfortunately, NSS Labs results are inherently unreliable.

Their testing methods were designed to favor IE and MS provides NSS several million for the funding of these so-called &quot;test&quot;...so, naturally, they are going to declare IE the most secure browser. It&#039;s what they were paid to do!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very time MS comes out with anew version of IE, NSS labs publishes results saying IE is best for blocking malware. Unfortunately, NSS Labs results are inherently unreliable.</p>
<p>Their testing methods were designed to favor IE and MS provides NSS several million for the funding of these so-called &#8220;test&#8221;&#8230;so, naturally, they are going to declare IE the most secure browser. It&#8217;s what they were paid to do!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Samit Tandukar		</title>
		<link>https://news.thewindowsclub.com/internet-explorer-blocking-malware-reports-study-55178/#comment-1155</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Samit Tandukar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 16:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewindowsclub.com/?p=55178#comment-1155</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[when will IE10 be available for windows 7???]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>when will IE10 be available for windows 7???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Arun Kumar		</title>
		<link>https://news.thewindowsclub.com/internet-explorer-blocking-malware-reports-study-55178/#comment-1154</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arun Kumar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 14:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewindowsclub.com/?p=55178#comment-1154</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[No doubt I trust IE when it comes to security. But the load time is still more compared to Chrome. While IE allows you to type URLs only after all components are loaded, Chrome provides it before proceeding to load other components - probably why it gives an impression of being faster than IE. The initial lag is the major turn off which is why people are moving towards alternates. MS needs to focus on this.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No doubt I trust IE when it comes to security. But the load time is still more compared to Chrome. While IE allows you to type URLs only after all components are loaded, Chrome provides it before proceeding to load other components &#8211; probably why it gives an impression of being faster than IE. The initial lag is the major turn off which is why people are moving towards alternates. MS needs to focus on this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
