<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Lenovo done with Windows Phone platform, says Microsoft not supporting it	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://news.thewindowsclub.com/lenovo-windows-phone-microsoft-86479/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://news.thewindowsclub.com/lenovo-windows-phone-microsoft-86479/</link>
	<description>TheWindowsClub Tech News covers the latest Microsoft Windows 10 news, along with other products &#38; services like Office, etc.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Dec 2019 15:34:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: fturla		</title>
		<link>https://news.thewindowsclub.com/lenovo-windows-phone-microsoft-86479/#comment-6055</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fturla]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2016 04:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.thewindowsclub.com/?p=86479#comment-6055</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Microsoft products suffered from top management&#039;s incompetence in marketing the Windows name into their other product offerings but not actually making much of the software compatible with the operating system that was installed on regular computers. The Windows on the phone, tablets, their surface product, etc. more than likely never had enough compatible programming built or supported by the organization to validate using the Windows name as a flagship. As a result of this false advertising, Windows as a tangible intellectual property has degraded. It simply allows the public to view many Google, Apple, and Linux operating systems a more amicable environment where people are more willing to change their software because the Windows name means less compatibility by their experience.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft products suffered from top management&#8217;s incompetence in marketing the Windows name into their other product offerings but not actually making much of the software compatible with the operating system that was installed on regular computers. The Windows on the phone, tablets, their surface product, etc. more than likely never had enough compatible programming built or supported by the organization to validate using the Windows name as a flagship. As a result of this false advertising, Windows as a tangible intellectual property has degraded. It simply allows the public to view many Google, Apple, and Linux operating systems a more amicable environment where people are more willing to change their software because the Windows name means less compatibility by their experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
