By: Dan

Dan — Wed, 24 Feb 2016 23:46:00 +0000

Where a phone is just another add-on piece of evidence to someone who’s been investigated along more traditional lines, and other probable cause exists first, of course an impartial inspection of a phone would be like any other evidence…as long as it’s under Court order, of course, or at least Court review; but where we need to follow 30 million + phone users all the time generally, or leave the door open to such “amusement” for amusement’s sake, I take the position usually given by Bruce Schneier or UK’s Baroness Shields.

By: Jim Carter

Jim Carter — Tue, 23 Feb 2016 20:17:00 +0000

“work phone that belonged to Syed Farook”. Since it was a “work phone” it did NOT belong to Farook. It is the property of his employer and it was his employer that gave the FBI permission to access the phone.

Comments on: Microsoft’s founder Bill Gates supports FBI in its encryption row with Apple

By: Dan

By: Jim Carter