<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Popular Browsers hacked at Pwn2Own 2015 Event	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://news.thewindowsclub.com/popular-browsers-hacked-pwn2own-2015-event-74961/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://news.thewindowsclub.com/popular-browsers-hacked-pwn2own-2015-event-74961/</link>
	<description>TheWindowsClub Tech News covers the latest Microsoft Windows 10 news, along with other products &#38; services like Office, etc.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2015 04:40:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Dan		</title>
		<link>https://news.thewindowsclub.com/popular-browsers-hacked-pwn2own-2015-event-74961/#comment-4793</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2015 04:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.thewindowsclub.com/?p=74961#comment-4793</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The only slight downside to all this &quot;pay hackers to pre-hack hackers&quot; stuff is that then browser makers proceed as if no one on earth, no tech or third party app, could possibly exist already defending against the &quot;hacking future&quot;; then, taking their browsers as if standalone in all user cases, they add fixes (with MS, often OS-based) and you sometimes get weird internet experiences as new browser defenses collide with already-present user defenses. For example, if one uses recent FF versions in some vpns, FF says it can&#039;t connect to Google because (apparently) the pin keys of Google reached via vpn are different than those you get using your normal dns...and then states this &quot;cannot be overridden&quot;...yet for some reason, secure search engines like DDG and StartPage remain usuable with FF in vpn.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only slight downside to all this &#8220;pay hackers to pre-hack hackers&#8221; stuff is that then browser makers proceed as if no one on earth, no tech or third party app, could possibly exist already defending against the &#8220;hacking future&#8221;; then, taking their browsers as if standalone in all user cases, they add fixes (with MS, often OS-based) and you sometimes get weird internet experiences as new browser defenses collide with already-present user defenses. For example, if one uses recent FF versions in some vpns, FF says it can&#8217;t connect to Google because (apparently) the pin keys of Google reached via vpn are different than those you get using your normal dns&#8230;and then states this &#8220;cannot be overridden&#8221;&#8230;yet for some reason, secure search engines like DDG and StartPage remain usuable with FF in vpn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
