<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Posterous to go offline on April 30 &#8211; Backup your data!	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://news.thewindowsclub.com/posterous-offline-april-30-backup-data-60256/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://news.thewindowsclub.com/posterous-offline-april-30-backup-data-60256/</link>
	<description>TheWindowsClub Tech News covers the latest Microsoft Windows 10 news, along with other products &#38; services like Office, etc.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2022 17:13:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Gregg L. DesElms		</title>
		<link>https://news.thewindowsclub.com/posterous-offline-april-30-backup-data-60256/#comment-1397</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gregg L. DesElms]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2013 01:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.thewindowsclub.com/?p=60256#comment-1397</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[So, then, Tumblr won. That&#039;s the bottom line. Tumblr and Posterous have always been the two big players in that market; and there are tons of &quot;which is better&quot; and &quot;Tumblr vs Posterous&quot; articles out there. What all this means, ultimately, is that Tumblr won. Simple as that.

And that&#039;s probably as it should be. I liked a few features of Posterous better than Tumblr; however, in the end, Tumblr pretty much out-classed Posterous across the board.  So the right company ultimately won, I guess.

It&#039;s been interesting to watch the tough economic times since 2008 take-down the also-ran companies out there. It&#039;s an interesting &quot;survival of the fittest&quot; economic lesson happening before our very eyes.

One of the pieces of advice that I&#039;ve always given people in the brick-and-mortar world whenever they&#039;re considering doing business with a small company has always been to go to the library and find a five- or ten-year-old (or even older) copy of the yellow pages, and then see if the company in question is in it. That, at least, shows whether the company&#039;s been around for a while, and saves one from dealing with a start-up that&#039;ll just end-up going out of business in a year or two. 

On the Internet, setting bookmarks to interesting websites, and then seeing if they still work two to five years later accomplishes a similar task. Of course, Posterous has been around long enough that none of that wisdom really applies. But you get my point. Longevity matters; and tough economic times culls the weaker companies (and their websites) from the herd, leaving only the strong and lasting ones. That&#039;s what we&#039;ve been witnessing, especially since 2008. This Posterous thing, really, is just a part of that.

Gregg L. DesElms
Napa, California USA
gregg at greggdeselms dot com
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, then, Tumblr won. That&#8217;s the bottom line. Tumblr and Posterous have always been the two big players in that market; and there are tons of &#8220;which is better&#8221; and &#8220;Tumblr vs Posterous&#8221; articles out there. What all this means, ultimately, is that Tumblr won. Simple as that.</p>
<p>And that&#8217;s probably as it should be. I liked a few features of Posterous better than Tumblr; however, in the end, Tumblr pretty much out-classed Posterous across the board.  So the right company ultimately won, I guess.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s been interesting to watch the tough economic times since 2008 take-down the also-ran companies out there. It&#8217;s an interesting &#8220;survival of the fittest&#8221; economic lesson happening before our very eyes.</p>
<p>One of the pieces of advice that I&#8217;ve always given people in the brick-and-mortar world whenever they&#8217;re considering doing business with a small company has always been to go to the library and find a five- or ten-year-old (or even older) copy of the yellow pages, and then see if the company in question is in it. That, at least, shows whether the company&#8217;s been around for a while, and saves one from dealing with a start-up that&#8217;ll just end-up going out of business in a year or two. </p>
<p>On the Internet, setting bookmarks to interesting websites, and then seeing if they still work two to five years later accomplishes a similar task. Of course, Posterous has been around long enough that none of that wisdom really applies. But you get my point. Longevity matters; and tough economic times culls the weaker companies (and their websites) from the herd, leaving only the strong and lasting ones. That&#8217;s what we&#8217;ve been witnessing, especially since 2008. This Posterous thing, really, is just a part of that.</p>
<p>Gregg L. DesElms<br />
Napa, California USA<br />
gregg at greggdeselms dot com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
