<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Surface Pro 4 to be Long Term Evolution capable	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://news.thewindowsclub.com/surface-pro-4-long-term-evolution-capable-70755/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://news.thewindowsclub.com/surface-pro-4-long-term-evolution-capable-70755/</link>
	<description>TheWindowsClub Tech News covers the latest Microsoft Windows 10 news, along with other products &#38; services like Office, etc.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 May 2022 11:06:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: hackerman1		</title>
		<link>https://news.thewindowsclub.com/surface-pro-4-long-term-evolution-capable-70755/#comment-3939</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hackerman1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2015 05:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.thewindowsclub.com/?p=70755#comment-3939</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I suggest you update the post with a clarification: &quot;LTE is commonly called 4G&quot;.

Even though the first 4G-networks are not genuine 4G they are marketed as such.
A more correct terminology would be 3.9G.
So this makes me wonder if Microsoft means &quot;real&quot; 4G or just existing 3.9 ?

Reference:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LTE_%28telecommunication%29
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/4G#Technical_understanding]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suggest you update the post with a clarification: &#8220;LTE is commonly called 4G&#8221;.</p>
<p>Even though the first 4G-networks are not genuine 4G they are marketed as such.<br />
A more correct terminology would be 3.9G.<br />
So this makes me wonder if Microsoft means &#8220;real&#8221; 4G or just existing 3.9 ?</p>
<p>Reference:<br />
<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LTE_%28telecommunication%29" rel="nofollow ugc">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LTE_%28telecommunication%29</a><br />
<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/4G#Technical_understanding" rel="nofollow ugc">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/4G#Technical_understanding</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Nobunaga Remnant		</title>
		<link>https://news.thewindowsclub.com/surface-pro-4-long-term-evolution-capable-70755/#comment-3917</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nobunaga Remnant]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2015 14:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.thewindowsclub.com/?p=70755#comment-3917</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I think its better they follow Apple strategy by announcing Wifi only model and Wifi+Cellular model :-)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think its better they follow Apple strategy by announcing Wifi only model and Wifi+Cellular model 🙂</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
