<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Microsoft unveils Holiday Lites Test to benchmark your browser’s performance	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://news.thewindowsclub.com/microsoft-unveils-holiday-lites-test-benchmark-browsers-performance-66848/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://news.thewindowsclub.com/microsoft-unveils-holiday-lites-test-benchmark-browsers-performance-66848/</link>
	<description>TheWindowsClub Tech News covers the latest Microsoft Windows 10 news, along with other products &#38; services like Office, etc.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2018 14:12:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Caleb		</title>
		<link>https://news.thewindowsclub.com/microsoft-unveils-holiday-lites-test-benchmark-browsers-performance-66848/#comment-2132</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Caleb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Dec 2013 03:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.thewindowsclub.com/?p=66848#comment-2132</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.thewindowsclub.com/microsoft-unveils-holiday-lites-test-benchmark-browsers-performance-66848/#comment-2131&quot;&gt;Frank&lt;/a&gt;.

Heh heh, looks like your browser didn&#039;t do too well! :D]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://news.thewindowsclub.com/microsoft-unveils-holiday-lites-test-benchmark-browsers-performance-66848/#comment-2131">Frank</a>.</p>
<p>Heh heh, looks like your browser didn&#8217;t do too well! 😀</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Frank		</title>
		<link>https://news.thewindowsclub.com/microsoft-unveils-holiday-lites-test-benchmark-browsers-performance-66848/#comment-2131</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Frank]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Dec 2013 20:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.thewindowsclub.com/?p=66848#comment-2131</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Really, Microsoft wrote a dumb web app that works best in IE 11. No!!!!!! Luckily the rest of the world does stuff otherwise I&#039;d be stuck with a dumbass browser that doesn&#039;t conform to standards (everyone elses standards). Nice try morons.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really, Microsoft wrote a dumb web app that works best in IE 11. No!!!!!! Luckily the rest of the world does stuff otherwise I&#8217;d be stuck with a dumbass browser that doesn&#8217;t conform to standards (everyone elses standards). Nice try morons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dan		</title>
		<link>https://news.thewindowsclub.com/microsoft-unveils-holiday-lites-test-benchmark-browsers-performance-66848/#comment-2128</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Dec 2013 06:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.thewindowsclub.com/?p=66848#comment-2128</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[On my &quot;geezer&quot; Windows 7 Home Premium SP1 64 bit dual core, Comodo Dragon (Chrome-based) completed &#039;Rudolph&#039; in 42.66 seconds; same PC using IE 11 for Windows 7, &#039;Rudolph&#039; completed in 7.92 seconds; don&#039;t know if that&#039;s due to Active X in IE better using site, or otherwise why, but in any case that&#039;s how the two browsers I just tested worked for me. Cheers!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On my &#8220;geezer&#8221; Windows 7 Home Premium SP1 64 bit dual core, Comodo Dragon (Chrome-based) completed &#8216;Rudolph&#8217; in 42.66 seconds; same PC using IE 11 for Windows 7, &#8216;Rudolph&#8217; completed in 7.92 seconds; don&#8217;t know if that&#8217;s due to Active X in IE better using site, or otherwise why, but in any case that&#8217;s how the two browsers I just tested worked for me. Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
