<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Windows Defender is now at par with popular Antivirus programs	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://news.thewindowsclub.com/windows-defender-at-par-with-popular-antivirus-81776/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://news.thewindowsclub.com/windows-defender-at-par-with-popular-antivirus-81776/</link>
	<description>TheWindowsClub Tech News covers the latest Microsoft Windows 10 news, along with other products &#38; services like Office, etc.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2016 18:24:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Jason Brown		</title>
		<link>https://news.thewindowsclub.com/windows-defender-at-par-with-popular-antivirus-81776/#comment-5835</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Brown]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2016 18:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.thewindowsclub.com/?p=81776#comment-5835</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.thewindowsclub.com/windows-defender-at-par-with-popular-antivirus-81776/#comment-5834&quot;&gt;Anand Khanse&lt;/a&gt;.

That was exactly the post I looked at. Microsoft score 3 out of 6 for protection, which is the lowest score out of all vendors. They are bottom. I fail to see how you can take this score and say &quot;it&#039;s good&quot;. It&#039;s actually rubbish. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://news.thewindowsclub.com/windows-defender-at-par-with-popular-antivirus-81776/#comment-5834">Anand Khanse</a>.</p>
<p>That was exactly the post I looked at. Microsoft score 3 out of 6 for protection, which is the lowest score out of all vendors. They are bottom. I fail to see how you can take this score and say &#8220;it&#8217;s good&#8221;. It&#8217;s actually rubbish. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jason Brown		</title>
		<link>https://news.thewindowsclub.com/windows-defender-at-par-with-popular-antivirus-81776/#comment-5836</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Brown]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2016 18:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.thewindowsclub.com/?p=81776#comment-5836</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.thewindowsclub.com/windows-defender-at-par-with-popular-antivirus-81776/#comment-5834&quot;&gt;Anand Khanse&lt;/a&gt;.

That was exactly the post I looked at. Microsoft score 3 out of 6 for protection, which is the lowest score out of all vendors. They are bottom. I fail to see how you can take this score and say &quot;it&#039;s good&quot;. It&#039;s actually rubbish. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://news.thewindowsclub.com/windows-defender-at-par-with-popular-antivirus-81776/#comment-5834">Anand Khanse</a>.</p>
<p>That was exactly the post I looked at. Microsoft score 3 out of 6 for protection, which is the lowest score out of all vendors. They are bottom. I fail to see how you can take this score and say &#8220;it&#8217;s good&#8221;. It&#8217;s actually rubbish. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anand Khanse		</title>
		<link>https://news.thewindowsclub.com/windows-defender-at-par-with-popular-antivirus-81776/#comment-5834</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anand Khanse]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2016 18:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.thewindowsclub.com/?p=81776#comment-5834</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.thewindowsclub.com/windows-defender-at-par-with-popular-antivirus-81776/#comment-5832&quot;&gt;Jason Brown&lt;/a&gt;.

I do not smoke at all. Perhaps you just completed your and commented without reading the post? Take a look at this link, which is the base for this post: https://www.av-test.org/en/antivirus/home-windows/]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://news.thewindowsclub.com/windows-defender-at-par-with-popular-antivirus-81776/#comment-5832">Jason Brown</a>.</p>
<p>I do not smoke at all. Perhaps you just completed your and commented without reading the post? Take a look at this link, which is the base for this post: <a href="https://www.av-test.org/en/antivirus/home-windows/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.av-test.org/en/antivirus/home-windows/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jason Brown		</title>
		<link>https://news.thewindowsclub.com/windows-defender-at-par-with-popular-antivirus-81776/#comment-5833</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Brown]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2016 14:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.thewindowsclub.com/?p=81776#comment-5833</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.thewindowsclub.com/windows-defender-at-par-with-popular-antivirus-81776/#comment-5812&quot;&gt;Benjamin Brown&lt;/a&gt;.

It&#039;s very poor, avoid.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://news.thewindowsclub.com/windows-defender-at-par-with-popular-antivirus-81776/#comment-5812">Benjamin Brown</a>.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s very poor, avoid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jason Brown		</title>
		<link>https://news.thewindowsclub.com/windows-defender-at-par-with-popular-antivirus-81776/#comment-5832</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Brown]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2016 14:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.thewindowsclub.com/?p=81776#comment-5832</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[With respect, you are spouting nonsense, MS scored ***bottom*** of the Protection rankings, and you say &#039;The result shows Microsoft Windows Defender 4.8 showing improvements in metrics...Protection for Windows Home Users&#039;. How do you draw that conclusion? Whatever you are smoking, can I get some please?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With respect, you are spouting nonsense, MS scored ***bottom*** of the Protection rankings, and you say &#8216;The result shows Microsoft Windows Defender 4.8 showing improvements in metrics&#8230;Protection for Windows Home Users&#8217;. How do you draw that conclusion? Whatever you are smoking, can I get some please?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anand Khanse		</title>
		<link>https://news.thewindowsclub.com/windows-defender-at-par-with-popular-antivirus-81776/#comment-5813</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anand Khanse]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2016 08:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.thewindowsclub.com/?p=81776#comment-5813</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://news.thewindowsclub.com/windows-defender-at-par-with-popular-antivirus-81776/#comment-5812&quot;&gt;Benjamin Brown&lt;/a&gt;.

You may use Windows Defender, along with a free stand-alone antivirus software like Malwarebytes or Emsisoft. Windows Defender will offer you good real-time protection, and you can use the stand-alone scanner to manually scan your PC, say once a week.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://news.thewindowsclub.com/windows-defender-at-par-with-popular-antivirus-81776/#comment-5812">Benjamin Brown</a>.</p>
<p>You may use Windows Defender, along with a free stand-alone antivirus software like Malwarebytes or Emsisoft. Windows Defender will offer you good real-time protection, and you can use the stand-alone scanner to manually scan your PC, say once a week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Benjamin Brown		</title>
		<link>https://news.thewindowsclub.com/windows-defender-at-par-with-popular-antivirus-81776/#comment-5812</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benjamin Brown]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2016 06:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.thewindowsclub.com/?p=81776#comment-5812</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[So, it is not beefed up as the claim?, I really wanna know as i&#039;m, tired of surfing for third party AV for windows machines.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, it is not beefed up as the claim?, I really wanna know as i&#8217;m, tired of surfing for third party AV for windows machines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Scott Ashley		</title>
		<link>https://news.thewindowsclub.com/windows-defender-at-par-with-popular-antivirus-81776/#comment-5776</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Ashley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2016 13:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.thewindowsclub.com/?p=81776#comment-5776</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Untrue, as of Feb 27, Windows Defender is still worst for protection for Windows 10 according to AV Test. You might want to recheck your information.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Untrue, as of Feb 27, Windows Defender is still worst for protection for Windows 10 according to AV Test. You might want to recheck your information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
